Teimuraz Gabashvili vs Tobias Kamke Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W W L W L W L W
Form
L L W L W L W W L LHead-2-Head: Gabashvili 3 - 1 Kamke
They have played 10 sets in total, with Gabashvili winning 7 and Kamke winning 3. The last match between Gabashvili and Kamke was at the Irving Challenger, 13-03-2017, Q2 round, Hard with Teimuraz Gabashvili getting the victory 3-6 6-3 6-2.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Teimuraz Gabashvili | 3 |
| Tobias Kamke | 1 |
Irving Challenger(13-03-2017)
3
6
6
3
6
2
| Gabashvili | Stats | Kamke |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 3 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| 881 | Ranking | Ret. |
| 43 | Highest Rank | 64 |
| 39 | Age | 38 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 11 | Titles | 11 |
| 53% (674-596) | Career Total W/L | 53% (552-486) |
| $1,636,260 | Career Prize Money | $1,074,711 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 2 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 1 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Fonseca VS Paul PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
26 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Shnaider VS Sevastova PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
26 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Gabashvili VS Kamke H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-6 6-3 6-2 | |||||
| 7-6(8) 3-6 7-5 |
Stats 
Tobias Kamke
Player
Teimuraz Gabashvili
63%
(
59 of
94)
1st Serve %
65%
(
70 of
107)
4
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
4
76%
(
45 of
59)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
52 of
70)
57%
(
20 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
31%
(
29 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
36 of
107)
101
Total Points Won
100
|
||||
| 6-1 6-4 | |||||
| 6-1 6-4 | |||||
Gabashvili VS Kamke H2H Stats
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 7 | Sets Won | 3 |
| 56 | Games Won | 38 |
| 7 | Aces (Total) | 4 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 0:35:14 | Average Match Time | 0:35:14 |
| 65% (70/107) | 1st Serve % | 63% (59/94) |
| 74% (52/70) | 1st Serve Win % | 76% (45/59) |
| 51% (19/37) | 2nd Serve Win % | 57% (20/35) |
| 100% (2/2) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 40% (2/5) |
| 31% (29/94) | Return Points Win % | 34% (36/107) |
| 75% (3/4) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 25% (1/4) |
| 0% (0/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 100% (1/1) |
| 50% (1/2) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 50% (2/1) |
| 0% (2/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 50% (2/1) |
| 50% (2/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (2/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Teimuraz Gabashvili Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Marko Maksimovic
Player
Teimuraz Gabashvili
60%
(
28 of
47)
1st Serve %
57%
(
31 of
54)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
6
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
17 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
60
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q2 |
Stats
Sami Ben Abdennibi
Player
Teimuraz Gabashvili
55%
(
32 of
58)
1st Serve %
56%
(
45 of
80)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
10
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
9 of
35)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
36%
(
21 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
43 of
80)
80
Total Points Won
58
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 5-7 6-2 10-7 | H2H | |||
| SF |
Stats
Mert Alkaya
Player
Teimuraz Gabashvili
67%
(
55 of
82)
1st Serve %
52%
(
58 of
112)
4
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
13
58%
(
32 of
55)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
37 of
58)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
25 of
54)
30%
(
6 of
20)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
41%
(
34 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
50 of
112)
98
Total Points Won
96
|
6-3 3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Teimuraz Gabashvili
Player
Aziz Ouakaa
64%
(
25 of
39)
1st Serve %
58%
(
30 of
52)
3
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
92%
(
23 of
25)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
23%
(
9 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
59
Total Points Won
32
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Teimuraz Gabashvili
Player
Pablo Trochu
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve %
51%
(
25 of
49)
9
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
28%
(
14 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
24 of
49)
60
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Teimuraz Gabashvili
Player
Ricardo Rodriguez-Pace
66%
(
39 of
59)
1st Serve %
73%
(
53 of
73)
6
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
3
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
35 of
53)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
17 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
28 of
73)
70
Total Points Won
62
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
view more
Tobias Kamke Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Marko Topo
Player
Tobias Kamke
48%
(
27 of
56)
1st Serve %
58%
(
34 of
59)
3
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
5
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
38%
(
11 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
43%
(
24 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
33 of
59)
65
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kaichi Uchida
Player
Tobias Kamke
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve %
67%
(
16 of
24)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
0
76%
(
16 of
21)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
10 of
16)
78%
(
7 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
7 of
30)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
34
Total Points Won
20
|
6-3 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tobias Kamke
Player
Tiago Cacao
72%
(
91 of
126)
1st Serve %
65%
(
65 of
100)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
5
67%
(
61 of
91)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
43 of
65)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
11%
(
2 of
18)
37%
(
47 of
126)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
40 of
100)
119
Total Points Won
107
|
6-7(7) 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF | w/o | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tobias Kamke
Player
Marek Gengel
49%
(
44 of
89)
1st Serve %
55%
(
43 of
78)
1
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
3
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
44%
(
20 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
78%
(
7 of
9)
47%
(
42 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
36 of
78)
83
Total Points Won
84
|
6-4 1-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Evgenii Tiurnev
Player
Tobias Kamke
54%
(
46 of
85)
1st Serve %
75%
(
80 of
107)
8
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
1
83%
(
38 of
46)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
52 of
80)
44%
(
17 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
35%
(
30 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
45 of
107)
100
Total Points Won
92
|
6-3 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tobias Kamke
Player
Marek Gengel
75%
(
41 of
55)
1st Serve %
67%
(
37 of
55)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
0
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
17 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
27 of
55)
65
Total Points Won
45
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ricardas Berankis
Player
Tobias Kamke
68%
(
46 of
68)
1st Serve %
59%
(
46 of
78)
5
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
4
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
35%
(
24 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
36 of
78)
80
Total Points Won
66
|
3-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tobias Kamke
Player
Henri Squire
53%
(
23 of
43)
1st Serve %
66%
(
42 of
64)
8
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
1
96%
(
22 of
23)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
31 of
42)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
7 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
27 of
64)
63
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tim Van Rijthoven
Player
Tobias Kamke
53%
(
23 of
43)
1st Serve %
51%
(
30 of
59)
9
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
4
91%
(
21 of
23)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
20 of
30)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
9 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
59)
62
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 53% (674/596) | Win/Loss | 53% (552/486) |
| 52% (1578/1475) | Sets Win/Loss | 53% (1265/1125) |
| 51% (14907/14264) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (11576/10895) |
| 55% (231/192) | Hard Win/Loss | 50% (123/123) |
| 55% (294/244) | Clay Win/Loss | 52% (193/180) |
| 49% (137/141) | Indoor Hard W/L | 57% (199/151) |
| 39% (12/19) | Grass Win/Loss | 54% (37/32) |
| 0.26 | Aces Per Game | 0.13 |
| 3711 | Aces Total | 1397 |
| 0.27 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.2 |
| 3815 | Total Double Faults | 2187 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 575.7 | Average Opponent Rank | 583.73 |
| 58% (39976/68588) | 1st Serve % | 59% (29278/49843) |
| 71% (28314/39984) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (19771/29278) |
| 48% (13842/28595) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (10479/20565) |
| 41% (2690/6529) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (2160/5131) |
| 39% (26776/68997) | Return Points Win % | 40% (20118/50099) |
| 46% (39/45) | Slam W/L | 47% (46/51) |
| 45% (48/59) | Masters W/L | 35% (16/30) |
| 60% (6/4) | Cups W/L | 33% (1/2) |
| 45% (148/182) | Main Tour W/L | 45% (95/116) |
| 56% (349/271) | Challenger W/L | 57% (335/252) |
| 71% (84/34) | Futures W/L | 63% (59/35) |
| 54% (641/1193) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 54% (524/977) |
| 39% (24/62) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 34% (14/41) |
| 51% (207/405) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 47% (136/288) |
| 55% (243/441) | Deciding Set Win % | 46% (125/273) |
| 83% (639/531) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (573/481) |
| 17% (639/107) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (573/92) |
| 22% (628/139) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 15% (464/68) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
